![]() Plus see the in game cutscenes of raynor, tychus etc, the model etc is not yet polish but it still looks the same as the screenshot of worlf of conflicts posted here. if they wanted to make it more realistic(without too much colors etc.) i know they can. i think blizz has made starcraft 2 visuals the way it is (not realistic, close up, or anything). CnC3 has realistic graphics but it doesn't really look as smooth as starcraft 2. anyway i think starcraft 2 has good graphics and visuals too, it sharp and smooth and got a lot of details etc. but i cant really compare, world of conflicts looks realistic while starcraft 2, well its a different style i guess. fortunately starcraft 2 as seen in the demo (not screenshot)is way more than fair, its awesome visually so im going to buy and play it. i will not play starcraft 2 if it doesn't look good, even a fair graphics is NOT ok with me. graphics or visuals is as important as the gameplay. Their outstanding cinematics demonstrate that they aren't technologically nor aesthetically lacking at all.Ĭlick to expand.i disagree. I think it's Blizzard choice, and not an incapability, to do what they do. I just think we've all come to understand and accept the pros 'n cons of Starcraft's visual quality. Walsh? You're Honda isn't as fast as these bad boys." It's kind of like you're going up to a bunch of average-income blue collar families and showing them pictures of Ferrari's and Lamborghini's and sayin, "You see Mrs. I think a great deal of us acknowledge this, and so we just sort of go with the flow and accept the pros that come with the "con" of less amazing graphics. While the thread itself is solely about graphics, ppl still have a right to state in this thread that they see more importance in other aspects of the game like gameplay, because you have brought up an aspect of the game for comparison, so others can as well.Īnd also, as many have mentioned, Blizzard does tone down a bit on the processor demands to accommodate a larger demographic, which I personally think is great of them and what makes their games so popular. Oh, and Paragon, I think many of us are aware that SC2 may not have the best graphics in the industry. I think we can only make a real judgment when the game comes out. I think a lot of this is just the result of the pre-beta stage. They didn't look saturated at all and the specular highlights and everything looked great. The Protoss structures in that demo looked VERY good in my opinion. To be honest I think the screenshots we've been looking at so far for SC2 'n all don't look as good as good as they did in the very first Protoss demo. WorldShift - Announced around the same time as SC2 StarCraft 2 - Release date Fall or Winter 2008 World in Conflict - Release date Fall 2007 Just graphics.Ĭompany of Heroes - Release date Fall 2006 Please note this topic is not about anything but graphics. For the sake of comparison, here are some other RTS games from about the same generation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |